{"id":4277,"date":"2021-02-27T04:52:34","date_gmt":"2021-02-27T03:52:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sola.kau.se\/cosie\/?page_id=4277"},"modified":"2021-04-13T11:11:29","modified_gmt":"2021-04-13T10:11:29","slug":"open-data-and-social-media-good-or-bad-for-co-creation","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sola.kau.se\/cosie\/project-level-findings\/open-data-and-social-media-good-or-bad-for-co-creation\/","title":{"rendered":"ICT, open data and social media"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
ICT, open data and social media<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Read and reflect upon<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n May digital communication technologies enhance user involvement in co-creation?<\/p> How may these technologies support co-creation?<\/p> What possible uses may big data and social media have?<\/p><\/blockquote><\/figure>\n\n\n\n The understanding of CoSIE partners is that co-creation implies a radical change in service culture, management and governance approaches. As such, it has implications for the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), including open data and social media.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Open government data is data that is produced or commissioned by government-controlled entities \u2013 publicly and freely available in digital formats for use, reuse and redistribution (Jamieson, et al 2019)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n ICT is one of many tools for co-creation. Open data and social media especially have been associated with a promise of enhancing broader stakeholder and user access<\/strong> to knowledge and service innovation platforms and involvement <\/strong>in co-creative activities (especially co-initiation, co-design phases) of service improvements and innovations. But there are broader expectations in renewing and democratising the services. Open data may aid:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some key promises of social media are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n In many of the CoSIE pilots, there are several national or local organizations and websites that offer advice, consultancy, guidance or support in working with open data. In Estonia, the Open Data Portal<\/a> provides a single point of access for the general public to unrestricted public sector data with the permission to re-use and redistribute such data for both commercial and non-commercial purposes. The City of Turku, Finland, has its own specialist to receive requests for open data. The specialist is not only helping the city staff to get data released, but also supports the consumers of the city\u2019s open data. There are also online resources to get started with. The website<\/a> has access to the open data APIs, the descriptions of these APIs and their usage instructions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Open data<\/strong>: We may evidence examples of both in CoSIE, especially the use of open data to discover user needs (Spain<\/a>), service experiences (Sweden<\/a>) and some service gaps and plan service changes (Sweden<\/a>). Only few pilots utilized open data in the \u201cimplementation phase\u201d: for instance see the Italian Pilot<\/a> where open data were embedded in the App.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Social media:<\/strong> We could also see how social media may help to reach out (Estonia<\/a>, Sweden<\/a>); and involve (Spain<\/a>) targeted marginalised groups. Indeed, enhanced user engagement offers opportunities for more tailored services, and in some cases (Sweden<\/a>) user and stakeholder engagement might be triggered by greater government transparency through open data.\u00a0 The Finnish pilot<\/a> developed a social media tool called Luuppi, with which they were able to examine and analyse social media posts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n ICT:<\/strong> Some pilots also utilized ICT tools in the co-creation process. The Italian pilot was dedicated to co-designing and implementing a digital solution but innovative adaptions of digital technologies are significant in Spain, Finland and Estonia. In Finland, digital technologies are important for reaching more of the target group (marginalised young people) than is possible in events and workshops. It must be recognized that \u2018Open Data\u2019 were used much more than ICT among our pilots.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yet, are perhaps the expectations of ICT somewhat overrated in enhancing co-creation of deeply tailored and meaningful welfare services that are highly interactive, relational, and demanding high ethics? There are limitations and even treats with using open data and social media in co-creation with vulnerable groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Immerse yourself<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Indicative literature for further reading<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Jallonen, H. and Hello, T. (2020) Co-Creation of Public Service Innovation Using Open Data and Social Media: Rhetoric, Reality, or Something in Between? International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy<\/a> 11(3):64-77, DOI: 10.4018\/IJIDE.2020070105<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Jamieson, D., Wilson R, Martin, M. (2019). The (im)possibilities of open data?, Public Money & Management, 39, (5), 364\u2013368 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09540962.2019.1611240<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Gebauer,J., F\u00fcller, J., Pezzei, R. (2013).The dark and the bright side of co-creation: Triggers of member behavior in online innovation communities. Journal of Business Research, 66 (9), 1516-1527 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jbusres.2012.09.013<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n